May 20, 2005
Fortunately, the New York Times firewall scheduled to go up in September for editorials and op-eds won't obstruct access to the occasional densely-reported piece, such as this series on social class that does not purport to be all-inclusive or the last word on class. (For once, we agree unreservedly with something the Times says...)
Yesterday, there were two stories. One described the marriage of Dan and Cate, a working-class-origin car salesman and a 54-year-old Westchester doctor's daughter. Our own opinion is that the "class" issues outlined have more to do with a spoiled and oblivious maturity-challenged way of looking at life on the part of the relatively moneyed partner, an approach not necessarily tied to class or wealth, though of course subsidized by it. No wonder some people are so hostile to "the rich," if this is typical of what they mean. Read it and decide for yourself.
The second report, a young woman who has become a lawyer and returned to the Kentucky area where she grew up, has more poignant notes. Her experiences and emotions capture the remarkably barren conceptual landscape of a deeply isolated and unimaginative culture, contrasted at rapid pace and high volume with the chatter of the upper middle class who engage in allusive conversation at a well-laid dinner table. If you, like we do, collect seemingly hopeless moments, "foster care" in Della Mae Justice' childhood is about as dreary as it gets. That, of course, is not the end of the story.
As is usually the case, if we only let it happen.